Dell Precision T5610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T5610
MotherboardDell Precision T5610  (all builds)
Memory117.1 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 05:09
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 137
55% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 625
52% 450 Pts
64-Core 1,992
123% 1,992 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
XFX(1682 9275) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 44.8
28% 37.9 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 33.1
Splatting 25.9
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 342 314 345 345 344 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 391
Write 346
Mixed 261
SusWrite 338
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 19.5
73% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 197
179% 274 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 96%
Liteonit LCS-256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 10B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 349 350 320 346 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 393
Write 359
Mixed 269
SusWrite 344
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 20.6
75% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 204
185% 284 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 96%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 147 147 147 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Read 150
Write 53.1
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 145
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 82%
Toshiba MQ01ACF0 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 127 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 123
Write 118
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 126
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Hammer Morespace 1TB
420GB free, PID 3070
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 23.9
Mixed 22.9
SusWrite 24.2
34% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A-PB Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Samsung M393B2K70DMB-YH9 Samsung M393B2K70DMB-YH9 128GB
1333, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
76.8% Very good
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 26.2
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T5610 Builds (Compare 687 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T5610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback