Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 23:05
Run Duration292 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 83.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 867
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,342
83% 1,342 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3975 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 101
Parallax 92.4
82% 97.7 fps
MRender 124
Gravity 92.5
Splatting 79.1
78% 98.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
62GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,869
Write 5,278
Mixed 6415
1,516% 6,854 MB/s
4K Read 440
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 194
1,037% 288 MB/s
DQ Read 1,230
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,021
783% 1,068 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
SSD 120GB
38GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 223 87 88 87 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 480
Write 145
Mixed 332
SusWrite 159
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 30.7
115% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 86.1
DQ Mixed 145
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 94%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,460
Write 1,617
Mixed 1,394
403% 1,823 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 80.7
271% 95.2 MB/s
DQ Read 986
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 931
698% 931 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
878GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1928 1902 1569 1490 1476 1412 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,529
Write 1,910
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 1,630
443% 1,979 MB/s
4K Read 66.8
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 57.5
200% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,030
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 120
194% 404 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 287%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 173 176 176 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 154
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 173
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
139GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 91 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 107
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 90
69% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.4
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 34
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback