Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 22:52
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
79% 145 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 608
66% 525 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 77%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 38.8
Parallax 37.5
31% 38.2 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 40.4
Splatting 26.7
28% 35 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30%
Great: 31%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 40
Parallax 7.5
5% 18 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10130001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1790
Write 1,867
Mixed 1566
389% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 53.7
183% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1162
DQ Write 886
DQ Mixed 1,008
758% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 220%
Seagate M3 2TB
262GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 8.6 8.6 8.5 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 8.7
20% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
137% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 67%
Seagate M3 2TB
275GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.9 8.7 8.7 8.8 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 36.6
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 8.8
20% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.4
134% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
754GB free
Firmware: 0708
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.9 8.4 8.7 8.7 8.8 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 39.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 8.7
22% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
227% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 64%
WD My Book 1170 2TB
782GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.2 8.2 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.8
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 8.2
34% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 50%
StoreJet Transcend 500GB
107GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Read 34
Write 35.5
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 1.5
29% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 44%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
106GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 35.8
Write 33.7
Mixed 25.2
40% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External HDD 500GB
464GB free, PID 0b0e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 38 37 38 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 35.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 37.3
47% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent 1TB
177GB free, PID 3008
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 8.5 8.4 8.4 8.2 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 38
Write 37
Mixed 27.6
SusWrite 8.5
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.9% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 12.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback