Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 20:55
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 916
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1680 MHz, MLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 114
Parallax 186
104% 143 fps
MRender 95.9
Gravity 129
Splatting 78.5
81% 101 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 231 237 96 73 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 442
Mixed 341
SusWrite 181
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 58.5
201% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 328
255% 351 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 225 231 222 227 229 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 229
Write 230
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 226
143% 196 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.6
349% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 131%
Great: 138%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
4GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 30 28 26 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 40
Write 32.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 28.7
22% 30.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 24.2
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 25.2
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback