Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200818
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 20:23
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	60.4% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 99.8 2-Core 212 70% 128 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 346 40% 313 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3766) 2GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24.4% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 34.8 Parallax 34.2 26% 33.8 fps	MRender 16.5 Gravity 34 Splatting 24 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 33 80 58 13 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Read 495 Write 339 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 108 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 1.2 40% 12.1 MB/s	DQ Read 84.8 DQ Write 5.6 DQ Mixed 19.8 21% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 61GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 98 98 99 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 85.7 Write 89.1 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 97.4 61% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2666C18 Kingston KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	70% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 30.1 MC Mixed 22.8 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 99.6 40% 99.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,706 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,070x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	930x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	278x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	355x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	299x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	131x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	157x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16