PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | Gigabyte H110M-A |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H110M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180412 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 25 '20 at 20:20 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
71.1%
Very good
|
68% 105 Pts
|
46% 337 Pts
|
30% 445 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
EVGA(3842 6264) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
53.1%
Above average
|
53% 65.9 fps
|
53% 62.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 279 271 273 264 267 MB/s
|
78%
Very good
|
67% 301 MB/s
|
94% 31.4 MB/s
|
205% 307 MB/s
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
204GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 178 178 177 178 MB/s
|
56.3%
Above average
|
58% 80.4 MB/s
|
96% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST3640323AS 640GB-$130
354GB free
Firmware: CC1F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 103 103 103 103 MB/s
|
63%
Good
|
73% 100 MB/s
|
172% 1.13 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.8FBD 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
70.2%
Very good
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
56% 71.7 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-6500Intel $176Bench 71%, 190,776 samples | 657x |
Core i3-6100Intel $115Bench 64%, 84,809 samples | 372x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $187Bench 80%, 286,724 samples | 250x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $290Bench 57%, 1,110,464 samples | 265x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $210Bench 53%, 459,268 samples | 242x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 695,028 samples | 222x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $650 |