Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M LE (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120214
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 19:19
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2380P 653 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 92.5 1-Core 87.6 2-Core 171 70% 117 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 336 45% 336 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	53.2% Above average	Lighting 65.7 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 61.3 54% 64.7 fps	MRender 64.1 Gravity 67 Splatting 62.2 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 200 218 219 218 149 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.8% Above average	Read 232 Write 222 Mixed 212 SusWrite 191 48% 214 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 32.9 106% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 48.4 40% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 187GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 92 104 108 108 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Read 156 Write 153 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 104 80% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x4GB 3,879 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	29% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	158x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	124x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	50x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	67x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	58x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	32x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16