Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$270 412,781 User benchmarks, average bench 82% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 82.6 1-Core 117 2-Core 233 82% 144 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 919 86% 696 Pts	64-Core 1,333 89% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$338 352,805 User benchmarks, average bench 89% Gigabyte(1458 3FC9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.8% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 104 Parallax 92.1 83% 99.4 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 78.4 Splatting 74.5 70% 94.8 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70 768,156 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 35 38 41 41 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 9,257 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 323GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 101 108 105 106 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 65 SusWrite 105 73% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$70 112,708 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	99.2% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 35.9 MC Mixed 31.7 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 26.6 SC Write 34.9 SC Mixed 27.8 85% 29.8 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 104%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Speed boat

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 66%, 271,645 samples	351x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 218%, 45,357 samples	292x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 65%, 28,409 samples	244x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 32,161 samples	389x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 122,321 samples	367x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $70Bench 84%, 112,708 samples	336x

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $429

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16