Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

1 month ago, 1 month ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$219 233,603 User benchmarks, average bench 95% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 76.7 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 469 8-Core 696 75% 583 Pts	64-Core 726 49% 726 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 178,674 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 91.2 221% 91.2 fps
Poor: 66% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$29 26,630 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 80 38 38 30 31 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 380 Write 318 Mixed 334 SusWrite 70.4 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 18 77% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 13.1 70% 154 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 91%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$57 478,856 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 406GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 474 476 474 410 293 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 445 Mixed 426 SusWrite 431 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 45.5 158% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 347 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 131%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52 280,094 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 213 213 207 213 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 38,475 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.4% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 21 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 97%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9600KIntel $219Bench 95%, 233,603 samples	133x
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 98%, 324,023 samples	115x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 318,672 samples	85x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 118%, 403,865 samples	51x
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 106%, 331,610 samples	45x
RTX 2060Nvidia $338Bench 89%, 352,805 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $65Bench 273%, 290,013 samples	34x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $85Bench 287%, 232,414 samples	28x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $110Bench 115%, 336,749 samples	19x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $81Bench 81%, 79,547 samples	29x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 85%, 191,326 samples	21x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $71Bench 83%, 417,739 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $875

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400	Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219	Nvidia RTX 3070 $500	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16