Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180921
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 14:01
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 76.7 1-Core 138 2-Core 275 88% 163 Pts	4-Core 530 8-Core 773 81% 652 Pts	64-Core 754 47% 754 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 91.2 223% 91.2 fps
Poor: 65% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 80 38 38 30 31 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 380 Write 318 Mixed 334 SusWrite 70.4 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 32.9 4K Mixed 18 77% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 13.1 70% 154 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 86%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 406GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 474 476 474 410 293 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 436 Write 445 Mixed 426 SusWrite 431 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 35.3 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 45.5 158% 55.7 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 347 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 213 213 207 213 214 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	66.4% Good	MC Read 25.5 MC Write 24.3 MC Mixed 21 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 21.9 59% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 507 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $249Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	119x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	106x
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	98x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	39x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	28x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	28x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	22x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	20x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $502

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16