Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 174 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 568 56% 459 Pts	64-Core 1,300 80% 1,300 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 178 174 176 176 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 589 Write 626 Mixed 606 SusWrite 176 112% 500 MB/s	4K Read 50.8 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 48 163% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 220 167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 121%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 598GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 554GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 247 247 245 246 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 594 Write 614 Mixed 600 SusWrite 248 116% 514 MB/s	4K Read 56.9 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 49.4 175% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 219 166% 224 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 167%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 18 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.3 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 6.6 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16