Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 05:55
Run Duration291 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$280
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 82
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 873
84% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,272
85% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 90.1
78% 94.6 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 91.2
Splatting 77.5
77% 95.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 82%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$57
62GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 6,581
Write 5,776
Mixed 5,913
1,358% 6,090 MB/s
4K Read 400
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 209
984% 272 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 911
716% 996 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 131%
SSD 120GB
38GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 222 87 85 87 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
68% Good
Read 471
Write 304
Mixed 328
SusWrite 156
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 28.8
108% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 159
115% 152 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68%
Great: 92%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$60
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 2,391
Write 1,523
Mixed 1,387
390% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 79.7
266% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 858
644% 860 MB/s
Poor: 158% Great: 289%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$140
878GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1822 1782 1547 1369 1466 1362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,550
Write 1,797
Mixed 1,592
SusWrite 1,558
419% 1,874 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 51.3
188% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 60.2
DQ Mixed 115
187% 387 MB/s
Poor: 230%
This bench: 278%
Great: 354%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$68
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 167 165 168 169 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 174
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 166
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 115%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$37
139GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 90 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 68.6
SusWrite 89.4
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 31.3
91% 32 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 16,103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,157
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback