Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 20:26
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900K-$449
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 79.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 309
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1,079
101% 841 Pts
64-Core 1,946
120% 1,946 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3716) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
139% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 186
Parallax 191
152% 188 fps
MRender 228
Gravity 190
Splatting 125
142% 181 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 139%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$73
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 827 830 929 957 1011 892 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,114
Write 1,014
Mixed 852
SusWrite 908
219% 972 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 24.4
96% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 570
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 222
198% 311 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 145%
Great: 295%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
19GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,275
Write 948
Mixed 1,011
240% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 38.5
145% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 914
674% 887 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$92
1TB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 186 183 183 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 227
Mixed 109
SusWrite 184
129% 176 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
428% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 106%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
782GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 89 87 90 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 91
Write 83
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 86.8
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 57%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.5 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Read 19.2
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.6
8% 8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z490-E GAMING - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback