PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1494 |
Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180510 |
Uptime | 5.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 23 '20 at 18:34 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adata SU635 240GB-$20
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 386 418 426 432 429 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
466GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 127 129 129 129 129 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 32GB
30GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.3 4.4 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 682x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 589x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 313x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 423x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 136x |
GTX 1050Nvidia $104Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 84x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |