Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$526
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 65.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 1,081
101% 816 Pts
64-Core 2,184
147% 2,184 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 33.4
28% 32.3 fps
MRender 33
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 32.5
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2362 632 497 500 501 504 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,284
Write 2,412
Mixed 1,962
SusWrite 833
420% 1,873 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.4
238% 83.9 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 568
DQ Mixed 703
521% 694 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 247%
Great: 387%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$120
465GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 240 114 101 93 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 499
Write 286
Mixed 324
SusWrite 181
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 43
157% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 118
100% 148 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 125%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
46GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 72 74 71 77 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 75.5
Write 74.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 72.5
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%
Maxtor 6V250F0 251GB
42GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 65.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 58.3
42% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.2
120% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 25.5
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 16,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $909
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback