HP ProDesk 600 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP ProDesk 600 G2 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 805D
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 12:16
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$67 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 87.5 1-Core 105 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 398 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.2 18% 19.8 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 17.1 17% 21.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB 2,611 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1006 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,381 Write 36.5 Mixed 80.7 242% 1,166 MB/s	4K Read 457 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.5 700% 155 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 94%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$29 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 74GB free Firmware: 1K02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 109 109 110 89 110 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 86.8 Write 80.2 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 105 64% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 207% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 90%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665, king stone data traveler 3 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.4 1 0.7 0.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	0.32% Terrible	Read 1 Write 1.7 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 0.8 2% 1.55 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.32% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 16GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	69.1% Good	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 22 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 19.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 70 57% 70 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 MT Builds (Compare 832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 MT

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	476x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	181x
Core i3-6100Intel $76Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	48x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	348x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	66x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	45x

SSD
MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 99%, 5,580 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
MZ7LN256HCHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 85%, 2,903 samples	20x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	32x
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 6,175 samples	24x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $67

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16