Positivo CHT14B

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo CHT14B  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo CHT14B
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171103
Uptime12 Days
Run DateNov 23 '20 at 11:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Memory 39.8
1-Core 23
2-Core 41.6
24% 34.8 Pts
4-Core 55
8-Core 79.2
9% 67.1 Pts
64-Core 77.8
5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 30%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 1.97
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 1.62
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2.09
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
7GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 3.8 4 3.9 3.9 3.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 36
Write 7.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 4.1
13% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
165% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 203
20% 203 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical CHT14B Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Positivo CHT14B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback