HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8509
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 10:42
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295 54,980 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Memory 92.5 1-Core 147 2-Core 296 98% 179 Pts	4-Core 584 8-Core 1,165 103% 875 Pts	64-Core 1,160 72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.4% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 108 Parallax 103 92% 108 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 93.5 Splatting 79.1 81% 102 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 378 306 310 297 297 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 719 Write 691 Mixed 653 SusWrite 322 134% 596 MB/s	4K Read 43.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 59.4 200% 71.2 MB/s	DQ Read 853 DQ Write 896 DQ Mixed 728 588% 826 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 201 200 201 201 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 148 Mixed 82.8 SusWrite 200 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB 4,094 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 34.3 MC Mixed 24.5 88% 30.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 31.2 SC Mixed 24.3 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 63.1 63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx Builds (Compare 1,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 99%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 127%

UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-1xxx

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	562x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	489x
Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	218x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	364x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	256x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	198x

SSD
SSDPEKNW010T8H 1TBIntelBench 183%, 4,172 samples	270x
SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GBIntelBench 147%, 27,018 samples	104x
hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG-8310A 512GBSKBench 131%, 6,904 samples	67x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 2x16GBKingstonBench 86%, 2,002 samples	411x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	286x
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	163x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $876

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16