Performance Results


Gaming 126% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171116
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	HKG-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 586 65% 510 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400 619,642 User benchmarks, average bench 148% Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	150% Outstanding	Lighting 225 Reflection 177 Parallax 213 183% 205 fps	MRender 187 Gravity 149 Splatting 125 122% 154 fps
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 158%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 20,095 User benchmarks, average bench 190% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 227 196 192 202 188 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,604 Write 508 Mixed 635 SusWrite 230 163% 744 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 44.4 157% 54.6 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 385 245% 286 MB/s
Poor: 131% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 244%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 747GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 135 137 134 136 133 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Read 184 Write 171 Mixed 104 SusWrite 136 33% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 9.3 4K Mixed 0.8 9% 4 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 10.5 DQ Mixed 1.5 2% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 23%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 205GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 124 125 125 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 136 Write 130 Mixed 91.4 SusWrite 124 89% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 213% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	62.5% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 20.1 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 15.4 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 17.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16