PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 60.8 GB free of 80.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 6.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 22 '20 at 16:43 |
Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.3%
Average
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M500 480GB-$84
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 112 144 76 75 82 MB/s
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$64
485GB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 95 81 107 108 108 MB/s
|
64.4%
Good
|
|||
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$64
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01K02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 279 240 307 314 310 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 24 24 25 24 MB/s
|
16.2%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |