Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 22 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-9370-$200
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 151
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 447
46% 364 Pts
64-Core 454
30% 454 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$280
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3204 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 102
Parallax 93.2
92% 102 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 89.1
66% 101 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDSR250GB 250GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 439
Write 275
Mixed 305
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 17.8
92% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 0.4
50% 119 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 93%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
10GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 339
Write 244
Mixed 179
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 25.5
94% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 120
117% 188 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 92%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$38
901GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 147 147 148 147 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 149
Write 146
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 146
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
131GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 64 63 64 63 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 82.7
Write 78.3
Mixed 44
SusWrite 63.2
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
178GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 84 86 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 93.5
Mixed 46.4
SusWrite 84.5
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
736GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 91 92 91 92 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 60.3
Write 88.6
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 89.9
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.2
61% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$55
27GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 65 66 65 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 56.1
Write 54.2
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 65.6
39% 52.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 15.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 13.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $730
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $143Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback