| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Compaq 8510p (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 30C5 |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20081202 |
| Uptime | 5 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 21 '20 at 23:18 |
| Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 27% |
PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
34.8%
Below average
|
30% 42.3 Pts
|
6% 44.7 Pts
|
3% 44.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2600
HP(103C 30C5) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
|
1.77%
Terrible
|
2% 2.53 fps
|
2% 2.49 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 174 185 156 67 68 MB/s
|
36.7%
Below average
|
34% 154 MB/s
|
53% 17.6 MB/s
|
100% 132 MB/s
|
|
Ricoh SD Disk Device 16GB
14GB free
Firmware: 01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 4.7 6.8 7 2.3 3.4 MB/s
|
3% 3.95 MB/s
|
12% 0.1 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
12.9%
Very poor
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
10% 3.37 GB/s
|
33% 121 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Compaq 8510p Builds (Compare 14 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Compaq 8510p
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo T7300Intel $90Bench 34%, 2,712 samples | 5x |
| Core2 Duo T7700Intel $100Bench 37%, 1,898 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Duo T7500Intel $90Bench 35%, 4,281 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $90 |