Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 22:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$197
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 85.8
1-Core 100
2-Core 185
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 390
54% 392 Pts
64-Core 388
26% 388 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (41 fps cap detected)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 43.9
Parallax 39
37% 42.8 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 36.2
23% 38.3 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 39%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT500MX200SSD6 500GB
184GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 370 410 415 414 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 383
Write 395
Mixed 288
SusWrite 387
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 95
4K Mixed 39.5
140% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 156
140% 204 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 113%
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
207GB free
Firmware: UF3600RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 137 144 145 145 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 399
Write 191
Mixed 234
SusWrite 138
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 15.4
58% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 41.3
43% 72 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 55%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$63
713GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 155 172 182 182 178 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 86.7
Write 196
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 165
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2
371% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 25.7
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $818
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback