PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P6T7 WS SUPERCOMPUTER (all builds) |
Memory | 6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101224 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '20 at 16:02 |
Run Duration | 247 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 6% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.1%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2881) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD WD5000YS-18MPB1 500GB
234GB free
Firmware: 07.02E07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 17 16 17 MB/s
|
22.6%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
71GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 91 89 88 90 MB/s
|
50.4%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
706GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 113 112 113 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB
68GB free
Firmware: 03.03V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 17 16 17 MB/s
|
26.3%
Poor
|
|||
External RAID 4TB
3TB free, PID ce34
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.8 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 MB/s
|
8.65%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
328GB free, PID 2120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
External RAID 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 000a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 8.8 7.2 7.2 7.1 7.2 MB/s
|
8.41%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 22x |
Core i7 975Intel $550Bench 72%, 3,143 samples | 11x |
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 12x |
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $600 |