Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4005 1,572 User benchmarks, average bench 28% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Memory 39.2 1-Core 28.5 2-Core 29.1 23% 32.3 Pts	4-Core 29.5 8-Core 66.5 6% 48 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2072) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.29% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 2.25 2% 2.59 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 5.17 3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.29% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 223GB free Firmware: SBFKJ1A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 416 429 443 452 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	90% Outstanding	Read 418 Write 334 Mixed 384 SusWrite 433 88% 392 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 67.8 4K Mixed 31.3 119% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 188 154% 219 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 90% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905711-015.A00G 2x4GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 98%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	112x
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	75x
Celeron J4025IntelBench 25%, 571 samples	65x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	177x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	107x

RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG_SkillBench 27%, 42 samples	7x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	6x
GR2400S464L17S/8G Crucial CT4G4SFS824A.C8FBD 12GBUnknownBench 27%, 6 samples	6x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16