Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 01:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 880
82% 685 Pts
64-Core 1,333
82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 98.6
90% 108 fps
MRender 98.9
Gravity 104
Splatting 104
84% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 286 204 146 208 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 481
Write 423
Mixed 308
SusWrite 225
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 35.9
122% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 148
116% 161 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 116%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
619GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 193 194 193 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 168
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 193
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.6
313% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 117%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
697GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 174 172 173 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 163
Mixed 136
SusWrite 173
120% 162 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
255% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 25
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.7
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $921
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback