Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 00:43
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$270
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 231
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 858
83% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,302
87% 1,302 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$330
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 115
Parallax 108
87% 110 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 103
Splatting 104
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$54
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 197 112 143 158 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 458
Write 234
Mixed 256
SusWrite 157
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 34.7
117% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 134
111% 162 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 118%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$99
619GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 147 147 148 148 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 214
Write 171
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 147
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.5
298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
697GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 172 173 172 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 162
Mixed 135
SusWrite 172
119% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 99%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.3% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 23.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 85.4
47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 16,384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback