Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200814
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 18:57
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$278
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 183
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 583
57% 456 Pts
64-Core 993
67% 993 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.8% Good
Lighting 87.8
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 73.1
71% 80.1 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 74.3
Splatting 69.9
64% 84 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 76%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$37
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 120 138 135 137 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46% Average
Read 441
Write 355
Mixed 296
SusWrite 134
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 7.8
56% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 70.3
DQ Mixed 18
33% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 46%
Great: 55%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
248GB free
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 647 653 650 649 614 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,803
Write 1,509
Mixed 936
SusWrite 681
275% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 95.8
4K Mixed 59.4
197% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 635
DQ Mixed 744
548% 723 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 207%
Great: 260%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 192 198 193 188 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 122
Write 159
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 190
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
85% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 19.6
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 96.2
42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 46,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback