Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9400 APU (2016 M.SR) 1,803 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Memory 50.2 1-Core 56.4 2-Core 82.8 39% 63.1 Pts	4-Core 83.7 8-Core 77.8 11% 80.8 Pts	64-Core 77.7 5% 77.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8381) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.40.46.06 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.61% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 6.08 Parallax 4.28 3% 4.5 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.77 Splatting 3.78 3% 3.28 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.61% Great: 4%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 836GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPH4 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 205 Write 138 Mixed 76.9 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
UFD 2.0 Silicon-Power8G 8GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 10.8 Write 5.8 Mixed 7 9% 7.87 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 1x8GB 2,846 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.1% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 7.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 7.2 18% 6.27 GB/s	Latency 160 25% 160 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	115x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	19x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	5x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	33x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 42,779 samples	20x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	20x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $66

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16