Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z2 SFF G4 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8456
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 19 '20 at 22:12
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Memory 83.6 1-Core 138 2-Core 272 90% 165 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 860 82% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,082 67% 1,082 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.3% Average	Lighting 55.9 Reflection 53.6 Parallax 46.8 46% 52.1 fps	MRender 45.2 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 48.2 39% 47.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H2 256GB 754 User benchmarks, average bench 204% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXD71HAQ SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 255 264 263 253 260 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 1,549 Write 1,232 Mixed 889 SusWrite 275 219% 986 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 70.8 4K Mixed 61.5 201% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 969 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 262 266% 456 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 241%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 523GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2024 2074 1527 1403 1410 1473 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,147 Write 2,125 Mixed 1,668 SusWrite 1,652 427% 1,898 MB/s	4K Read 62.2 4K Write 68 4K Mixed 60.7 208% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,242 DQ Write 123 DQ Mixed 230 283% 532 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 410%
Jmicron Tech 1TB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 631GB free Firmware: 0105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 347 349 339 313 326 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 317 Write 264 Mixed 279 SusWrite 338 68% 299 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 35.2 4K Mixed 26.7 87% 28.1 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 93.6 DQ Mixed 122 90% 120 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 23 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 19.8 SC Write 35 SC Mixed 26.4 77% 27.1 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	75x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 24%, 8,041 samples	70x
Quadro P620NvidiaBench 18%, 6,548 samples	58x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H2 512GBSamsungBench 240%, 2,013 samples	47x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H2 256GBSamsungBench 204%, 754 samples	31x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	14x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	28x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	15x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBMicronBench 78%, 6,317 samples	14x

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16