Asrock B450 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200305
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 15:55
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 83.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 285
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 801
81% 656 Pts
64-Core 1,035
64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
EVGA(3842 3885) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.4 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
178GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 473 465 481 471 482 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 484
Mixed 384
SusWrite 473
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 38.5
170% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 185
184% 297 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 115%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 221 212 223 237 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 346
Write 293
Mixed 228
SusWrite 227
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 36.4
138% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 182
143% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 115 115 116 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 180
Write 157
Mixed 96.6
SusWrite 114
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
324GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 119 123 112 113 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 114
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
214GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 70 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 81.2
Write 83.2
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 72
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
46GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.1 4.5 9.3 10 9.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 13
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 6
5% 4.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 33.5
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 31.9
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 Pro4 Builds (Compare 4,503 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $403
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback