Asus P5N-E SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics47.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P5N-E SLI  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 15:37
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 55
1-Core 27.3
2-Core 54.7
31% 45.7 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 107
14% 107 Pts
64-Core 98.7
6% 98.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.9% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 92.2
45% 63.7 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 69.5
Splatting 58
53% 66.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU 635 240GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 91 69 82 99 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 11% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 2.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 2.2
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-E SLI Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-E SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $195
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback