Asrock Z490 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	47.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z490 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200623
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '20 at 20:35
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10700K-$236 198,859 User benchmarks, average bench 97% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 157 2-Core 303 101% 184 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 1,073 96% 812 Pts	64-Core 1,646 102% 1,646 Pts
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% Asus(1043 0583) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.1% Average	Lighting 49 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 181 40% 82.6 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 101 Splatting 41.5 61% 79.1 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 131GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 61 64 63 64 63 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261 25,763 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 204GB free Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 326 343 359 376 375 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 501 Write 402 Mixed 305 SusWrite 362 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 68.9 4K Mixed 27.7 107% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 293 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 155 126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 86%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 1,355 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1.5TB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 28 23 21 23 30 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 113 Write 110 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 38.3 93% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 13,446 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 30.2 SC Mixed 24.3 69% 24.1 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z490 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 143%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 142%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z490 Extreme4

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $236Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	310x
Core i9-10850KIntel $286Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	147x
Core i5-10600KIntel $144Bench 92%, 70,951 samples	89x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	144x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	94x
RTX 3070-TiNvidia $499Bench 158%, 218,061 samples	71x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	56x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	34x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	44x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	25x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 90%, 46,140 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $782

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16