Asus Z170-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics71.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Z170-E  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateNov 18 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$267
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 206
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 517
54% 424 Pts
64-Core 600
40% 600 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$808
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
71.5% Very good
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 33
Parallax 163
20% 73.4 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 172
Splatting 112
132% 133 fps
Poor: 112%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 153%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$125
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 207 145 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 354
Write 264
Mixed 274
SusWrite 189
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 38.9
129% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 134%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
21GB free
Firmware: CS131122
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 201 55 78 177 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 356
Write 352
Mixed 292
SusWrite 143
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 28.5
104% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 206
190% 290 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 96%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$78
33GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 148 148 149 148 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 341
Write 331
Mixed 280
SusWrite 178
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 35.9
131% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 350
266% 358 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$38
282GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 163 163 163 163 163 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 87
Write 88
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 163
73% 99.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$118
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.3% Very good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 23.1
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170-E Builds (Compare 2,191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus Z170-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $738
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback