Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181227
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '20 at 15:43
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	Memory 81.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 284 92% 170 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 826 86% 693 Pts	64-Core 808 50% 808 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.7% Below average	Lighting 39.5 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.1 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 37.9 Splatting 36.2 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HAFV-000 128GB 1,744 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM10H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 204 184 183 188 149 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 465 Write 220 Mixed 195 SusWrite 181 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 34.9 136% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 362 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 115 122% 208 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 100%
Samsung MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GB 4,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 118GB free Firmware: DXT05L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 128 128 127 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 484 Write 131 Mixed 132 SusWrite 128 48% 219 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 17.4 105% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 329 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 55.4 86% 168 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 71%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 512GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 456 461 464 462 463 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 505 Write 459 Mixed 387 SusWrite 457 102% 452 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 16.7 78% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 13.9 DQ Mixed 25.1 61% 138 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMR32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMK128GX4M8X3200C16 029E CMK128GX4M8X3200C16 64GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.7% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.7 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 16.1 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 23.7 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,317x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,136x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,085x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,045x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	812x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	685x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	510x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	466x

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $897

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16