PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170 PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160513 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Nov 17 '20 at 20:34 |
Run Duration | 238 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 24% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
88.8%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
686GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 251 210 261 397 444 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
WDC WD4003FFBX-68MU3N0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 228 239 228 239 234 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 314 315 313 312 315 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
930GB free
Firmware: 0K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 107 106 107 107 MB/s
|
62.5%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 102 102 102 104 MB/s
|
57.2%
Above average
|
|||
ASMT 2115 500GB
226GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 85 82 80 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 64GB-$20
21GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 109 59 51 51 51 MB/s
|
53.6%
Above average
|
|||
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
4GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 22 20 22 MB/s
|
8.5%
Terrible
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
41GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 17 17 17 MB/s
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
101%
Outstanding
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 6,629x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 3,674x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 1,045x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 2,168x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 1,383x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 1,250x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $750 |