Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '20 at 09:34
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	60%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$88 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 74.7 1-Core 89.7 2-Core 255 74% 140 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 470 64% 475 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.7% Good	Lighting 84.7 Reflection 77 Parallax 69 69% 76.9 fps	MRender 66 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 68.4 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 80 30 132 19 44 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.4% Poor	Read 129 Write 90.7 Mixed 84 SusWrite 77.1 21% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 10.1 43% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 34.2 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 117 92% 122 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 100%
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 284GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 82 83 84 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 84.2 Write 57.2 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 82 50% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 47,473 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.5% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 9.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 90.9 44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,296x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,134x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	135x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	563x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	308x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	266x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	181x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $33Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	134x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	126x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	91x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	81x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $285

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16