Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 17 '20 at 08:32
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 184
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 310
44% 324 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.8% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.7
32% 36.1 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 36.8
31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 118 120 112 110 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 300
Write 251
Mixed 230
SusWrite 122
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 16.5
53% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 33.1
DQ Write 44
DQ Mixed 41.3
30% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 124%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 99 98 96 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
64% Good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 96.9
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64%
Great: 87%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
130GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 29 22 23 26 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 29.9
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 25
18% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 101%
WD WD60EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 107 127 124 120 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 101%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
422GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 113 147 141 142 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 137
Write 128
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 137
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 97%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 132 162 154 154 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 138
Write 152
Mixed 122
SusWrite 152
104% 141 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
396% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.8% Below average
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback