Asus P8H77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	66.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	20.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141017
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 16:51
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.8% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 162 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 326 44% 326 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	66.4% Good	Lighting 85.2 Reflection 72.8 Parallax 57.3 69% 71.8 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 78 Splatting 73.5 60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 289 302 304 305 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Read 367 Write 357 Mixed 321 SusWrite 288 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 48.4 4K Mixed 36.1 114% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 52.3 45% 64.2 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 129%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 22GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	6.91% Terrible	Read 24.6 Write 22.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 11.2 19% 15.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.91% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF 24GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 15.2 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-M PRO Builds (Compare 703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	187x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	78x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	64x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	17x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	20x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	11x
F641GU67F1600G 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 191 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $802

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16