Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Memory 41.3 1-Core 56.5 2-Core 113 39% 70.3 Pts	4-Core 216 8-Core 219 29% 217 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(F000 02F3) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.7988 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.79% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 2.27 Splatting 0.13 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.79% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
M.2 C100 512GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 441GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0615A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 363 341 318 333 366 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Read 472 Write 384 Mixed 356 SusWrite 342 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 17.5 88% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 25.3 72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 12.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	48x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	48x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	48x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16