Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_TUF705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200922
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '20 at 11:21
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 41.1 1-Core 41.4 2-Core 73 31% 51.8 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 323 34% 274 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 19.20.36.03 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	16.5% Very poor	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.5 Parallax 40.2 8% 20.6 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.1 Splatting 42.7 33% 39.5 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 210 232 205 205 208 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 599 Write 511 Mixed 518 SusWrite 227 104% 464 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 33.6 113% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 414 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 359 265% 352 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 187%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 176GB free Firmware: JU0C SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 71 75 80 82 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 133 Write 124 Mixed 55 SusWrite 79.5 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.5 157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB 54,121 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.7% Below average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.7 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 8.4 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 197 20% 197 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	39x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	27x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	18x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	11x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	21x
HFM128GDJTNG-8310A 128GBBench 95%, 6,558 samples	8x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	8x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	12x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	11x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16