Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte X299 UD4
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF  (all builds)
Memory118.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit, , Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 05:58
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$970
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 244
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 920
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,533
103% 1,533 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 94%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 123 161 141 142 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 455
Mixed 396
SusWrite 174
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 54.3
189% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 339
258% 350 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 122%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$40
3GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 495
Write 462
Mixed 440
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 55.7
194% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 118 119 120 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.9% Good
Read 122
Write 88.3
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 119
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 182 184 184 184 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 115
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 182
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$70
734GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 141 143 143 144 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 125
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 142
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 51.5
MC Mixed 32.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 8.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X299 UD4-CF Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 UD4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $1,373
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $200Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback