Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '20 at 18:10
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	91% Outstanding	Memory 92.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 701 74% 592 Pts	64-Core 694 43% 694 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 91% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 37.5 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 30.1 31% 32.5 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 36.5 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB 15,006 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 268 170 157 148 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	163% Outstanding	Read 1,152 Write 924 Mixed 933 SusWrite 199 179% 802 MB/s	4K Read 47.3 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 67 228% 82.3 MB/s	DQ Read 682 DQ Write 840 DQ Mixed 578 487% 700 MB/s
Poor: 119% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 199%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 154 156 153 154 153 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Read 165 Write 167 Mixed 103 SusWrite 154 33% 147 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 0.8 12% 4.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.4 DQ Mixed 1.3 2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 23%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 131GB free Firmware: 603ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 161 149 144 151 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 389 Write 204 Mixed 234 SusWrite 150 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 36.8 135% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 147 116% 156 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 85%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB 47,517 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 882GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 155 156 154 158 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 164 Write 150 Mixed 100 SusWrite 155 32% 142 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.7 13% 4.83 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 23%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 304 302 303 306 307 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 503 Write 483 Mixed 416 SusWrite 322 97% 431 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 56.7 190% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 351 265% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 626GB free, PID 107c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 103 104 105 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.4% Average	Read 109 Write 103 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 104 131% 97.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 44%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 772 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 880GB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 37 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 38.3 Write 34 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 36.2 44% 33.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GB 22,274 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.1% Very good	MC Read 30.7 MC Write 29 MC Mixed 23 79% 27.6 GB/s	SC Read 18 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.8 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 84%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B360-F GAMING - $140

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	833x
Core i5-9400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	827x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	369x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	292x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	292x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	264x

SSD
SA2000M81000G 1TBKingstonBench 234%, 77,062 samples	116x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	102x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	96x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	564x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	208x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	148x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $815

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16