PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110610 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 15 '20 at 12:05 |
Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
56.1%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 5000
HP(103C 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
|
11.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 24 20 46 125 123 MB/s
|
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB
791GB free
Firmware: A41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 92 94 102 107 109 MB/s
|
60%
Above average
|
|||
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
7GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 27 27 MB/s
|
22%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 318x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 188x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 179x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 87x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 67x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |