Supermicro C7Z270-CG-L

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Supermicro C7Z270-CG-L (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro C7Z270-CG-L
Memory	1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161006
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '20 at 07:20
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 96 2-Core 196 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 349 45% 342 Pts	64-Core 433 27% 433 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.7% Average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 59.4 Parallax 59 49% 59.4 fps	MRender 65 Gravity 59.5 Splatting 63.6 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 192 196 192 180 182 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	78.1% Very good	Read 396 Write 320 Mixed 306 SusWrite 185 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 52.5 4K Mixed 40.8 117% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 250 DQ Mixed 240 198% 285 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 316GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 129 131 126 120 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 106 Write 92.5 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 123 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	55% Above average	MC Read 24 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 18.8 59% 20.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 72.6 55% 72.6 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical C7Z270-CG-L Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 82%

Aircraft carrier

System: Supermicro C7Z270-CG-L

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	15x
Core i7-7700KIntel $241Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	14x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	13x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $80Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	9x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	8x
MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBMicronBench 169%, 6,615 samples	6x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GBUnknownBench 86%, 21,064 samples	9x
Skill Intl F4-2133C15-16GVR 2x16GBGBench 72%, 37 samples	6x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GBHyperX $165Bench 81%, 6,271 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $732

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16