Asus Z170-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 119%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 02:58
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$310
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 236
88% 151 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 530
59% 453 Pts
64-Core 533
36% 533 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
EVGA(3842 3897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 240
Parallax 315
169% 255 fps
MRender 305
Gravity 233
Splatting 139
196% 226 fps
Poor: 132%
This bench: 181%
Great: 225%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$391
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 913 898 901 891 875 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,651
Write 1230
Mixed 745
SusWrite 897
252% 1,131 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 54.7
196% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,140
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 448
412% 654 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 215%
Great: 281%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$160
427GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2352 2313 939 946 941 935 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
283% Outstanding
Read 1,798
Write 2,252
Mixed 1,859
SusWrite 1,404
413% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 70.7
227% 83.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,358
DQ Write 1,095
DQ Mixed 1,271
939% 1,241 MB/s
Poor: 200%
This bench: 283%
Great: 479%
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$100
238GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 349 365 371 372 373 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Read 332
Write 373
Mixed 263
SusWrite 359
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 211
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 107%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 167 171 172 175 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 164
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 171
109% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.1
290% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 177%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
95GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 80 83 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 69
Write 64.9
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 81.6
50% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 28.7
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus Z170-DELUXE - $319

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-10700K $277Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $92SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback