Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9880H 11,095 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 91.2 1-Core 140 2-Core 278 94% 170 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 927 87% 724 Pts	64-Core 1,203 74% 1,203 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 1,330 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Legend(17AA 2296) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1560 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 443.32 Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.2% Excellent	Lighting 99.9 Reflection 121 Parallax 113 81% 111 fps	MRender 150 Gravity 96.2 Splatting 91.3 89% 113 fps
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 103%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 322GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1381 1260 1168 1040 1113 977 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	279% Outstanding	Read 1,843 Write 1,926 Mixed 927 SusWrite 1,156 328% 1,463 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 149 4K Mixed 87.6 288% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,123 DQ Write 914 DQ Mixed 1,028 767% 1,021 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 279% Great: 410%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB 4,445 User benchmarks, average bench 250% 574GB free Firmware: 11170101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 1290 1262 1338 1267 1288 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 1,512 Write 1,333 Mixed 890 SusWrite 1,306 283% 1,260 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 70.2 242% 90.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,170 DQ Write 895 DQ Mixed 1,066 788% 1,044 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 332%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB 13,039 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 396GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 376 371 357 365 352 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Read 312 Write 309 Mixed 302 SusWrite 368 73% 323 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 28.6 92% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 89.7 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 130 100% 133 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 1x31GB 2,778 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 13.3 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	75x
Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples	44x
Quadro T2000NvidiaBench 43%, 3,549 samples	26x

SSD
PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TBWDCBench 250%, 4,445 samples	29x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000L7 1TBSamsungBench 289%, 9,415 samples	21x
MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 12,020 samples	17x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples	18x
M471A4G43MB1-CTD 2x31.5GBSamsungBench 79%, 5,545 samples	17x
RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 2x16GBRamaxelBench 81%, 1,100 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16