MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 132% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 140% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	166% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	86.6 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '20 at 06:19
Run Duration	203 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X 3,902 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 77.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 238 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 740 74% 602 Pts	64-Core 1,698 105% 1,698 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,275 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3987) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	163% Outstanding	Lighting 217 Reflection 266 Parallax 327 177% 270 fps	MRender 316 Gravity 251 Splatting 142 183% 237 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 163% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$60 15,626 User benchmarks, average bench 216% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN139B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 510 514 433 481 491 478 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	166% Outstanding	Read 2,301 Write 479 Mixed 601 SusWrite 484 210% 967 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 39 4K Mixed 32.8 110% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 96.3 DQ Mixed 144 129% 204 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 166% Great: 333%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 279GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 427 396 425 417 412 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 493 Write 448 Mixed 406 SusWrite 415 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 38.7 4K Write 34.9 4K Mixed 37.8 126% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 88.6 DQ Mixed 183 148% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 134%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 183 170 185 175 171 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 55GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 86 81 88 82 80 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 62.3 Write 65.2 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 83.1 47% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 69GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 72 78 72 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 78.2 Write 71.5 Mixed 43.2 SusWrite 73.2 49% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 88%
ST310005 24AS 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 14GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 36 39 37 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	19% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 38.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 37.2 48% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 19%
Lexar CF USB_3_0 Read 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 14GB free, PID b050 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 25 26 28 26 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 34.2 Write 24.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 25 36% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 38% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-2666C15-16GVR BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE F4-2666C15-16GVR BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 96GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 25.1 MC Mixed 23.7 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 28.3 SC Mixed 25.6 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 85.5 47% 85.5 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	123x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16