Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Memory 39.6
1-Core 19.6
2-Core 40.6
22% 33.3 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 332
24% 222 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 33
Parallax 79.7
21% 46.1 fps
MRender 56
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 70.9
50% 60 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 287 287 269 282 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 739
Write 307
Mixed 397
SusWrite 263
94% 427 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17.3
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 167
124% 165 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 193%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 218 215 214 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 209
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
92GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 132 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 178
Write 158
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 134
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2933 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
42.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback