Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200702
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26% Poor
Memory 39.6
1-Core 17.8
2-Core 35
22% 30.8 Pts
4-Core 66.4
8-Core 299
20% 183 Pts
64-Core 501
34% 501 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 26%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 33
Parallax 79.7
21% 46.1 fps
MRender 56
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 70.9
43% 60 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 51%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$36
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 287 287 269 282 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 739
Write 307
Mixed 397
SusWrite 263
94% 427 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17.3
67% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 167
124% 165 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 189%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$52
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 218 215 214 215 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 129
Write 114
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 209
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$68
92GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 132 136 136 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 178
Write 158
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 134
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2933 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 13,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,016
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-10600K $257Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $47
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10400F $161Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback