Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	8.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 620 5,981 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.6% Below average	Memory 54.8 1-Core 33.2 2-Core 68.1 34% 52 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 127 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 3610) 2GB CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.04% Terrible	Lighting 10.2 Reflection 8.92 Parallax 10.5 8% 9.87 fps	MRender 12.1 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 7.87 8% 9.5 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 21 25 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 263GB free Firmware: 12.01B02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 48.3 Write 45.7 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 47.9 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-026.A 9905403-011.A 99U5474-026.A 9905403-011.A 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.7% Poor	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 144 28% 144 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	61x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16