Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook Fury 15 G7 Mobile Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8783
Memory	28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 13 '20 at 18:38
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-10885M 917 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Memory 89.1 1-Core 156 2-Core 313 100% 186 Pts	4-Core 565 8-Core 1,040 96% 802 Pts	64-Core 1,364 84% 1,364 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 with Max-Q Design 351 User benchmarks, average bench 87% HP(103C 8783) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4332 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.3% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 116 Parallax 112 85% 111 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 91.2 Splatting 84.7 83% 104 fps
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 84.3% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB 6,082 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 376GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGHA4101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 804 802 772 745 742 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	261% Outstanding	Read 2,123 Write 1,723 Mixed 804 SusWrite 945 311% 1,399 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 69.9 235% 84.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,051 DQ Write 1,003 DQ Mixed 916 718% 990 MB/s
Poor: 121% ↑ This bench: 261% Great: 247%
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 196GB free Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1134 1235 1316 1211 1255 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	219% Outstanding	Read 938 Write 1,206 Mixed 653 SusWrite 1,216 227% 1,003 MB/s	4K Read 44.3 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 63.3 218% 79.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,004 DQ Write 795 DQ Mixed 629 544% 809 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 219% Great: 235%
USB Disk 3.0 64GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 58GB free, PID 0918 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 22 22 22 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	21% Poor	Read 64.8 Write 17.1 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 19.6 51% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.2 168% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 31.7 MC Mixed 24.9 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 27.5 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 68.3 58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	323x
Quadro T2000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 39%, 1,016 samples	143x
Quadro T1000 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 36%, 566 samples	100x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples	84x
KIOXIA 1TBKxg60znv1t02Bench 208%, 4,378 samples	79x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples	78x

RAM
HMAA4GS6AJR8N-XN 1x31GBHynixBench 48%, 958 samples	69x
16ATF4G64HZ-3G2E2 1x31GBMicronBench 49%, 283 samples	46x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	42x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16